Better decision-making: How embedding social impact drives better decisions in the built environment

In the world of urban development, success is often quantified by units built, square footage completed, and deadlines met. But for a truly thriving community, and for a development to earn its place as a lasting asset, success must also be measured by something that is often considered less tangible, but is arguably far more important: its impact on people and place.

This is the imperative of social impact. It’s about understanding what a development truly delivers for existing communities, and what it means for new residents or people who visit and use the space.

Ignoring social impact or treating it as an afterthought is increasingly at odds with public and investor expectations.

Developers, local authorities, and built environment professionals face increasing scrutiny around their contributions to local communities, wellbeing, and equitable outcomes. Without a robust approach to measuring social impact, projects risk:

  • Misaligned development: Creating places that don’t genuinely address community needs, leading to underutilised assets or social friction.
  • Reputational damage: Projects perceived as uncaring or opaque, breeding cynicism and resistance from the very communities they aim to serve.
  • Wasted investment: Resources directed based on assumptions, not on evidence of what truly creates social value.
  • Missed opportunities: Failing to unlock additional funding, partnerships, or long-term value that comes from a clear social purpose.